I am currently reading a book entitled unChristian: What a New Generation Really Thinks about Christianity… and Why it Matters by David Kinnaman and Gabe Lyons.
It is a book that has me heartbroken and compassionate and angry and inspired all at the same time. This book is the culmination of a research project commissioned by Lyons, founder of Fermi Project, and headed up by Kinnaman, president of The Barna Group, a research firm “focused on the intersection of faith and culture”.
This research was begun to determine how our generation (twentysomethings and those several years older and several years younger) currently perceives Christianity.
I am only through the first two chapters and already I see a perception that is not far off from what I had come to assume, one that shows that Christianity has gone off track.
There is an old song that goes, “They will know we are Christians by our love”. That should be convicting to the Church today, because, according to this research, the Church and Christians — we — are not being known for love, either of each other, or of those outside of the faith.
The entire New Testament is based on two principles: Truth soaked in Love. Everything that Jesus did was motivated by these principles and in everything the early Church did, they strived to likewise live these out. Somewhere in recent Church history, we lost the element of Love and began focusing primarily, almost solely, on Truth. And now today, there is a movement of Christianity that, in an attempt to rectify past wrongs, focuses primarily on Love, fearing to bring Truth to light.
I had long believed that we were perceived negatively and it is heartbreaking to read the truth of it on paper. It isn’t even the negative perception I struggle with. There will always be people who disagree with what I believe. It is why we are perceived negatively. It seems to be often because of hurt.
Christians aren’t perfect. We make mistakes. But we also struggle to admit when we are wrong. We struggle to accept people as they are. I don’t think it’s just a Christian thing. It’s a people thing. But a Christian is a Christ-follower, and based on that title, our model of how to live is Jesus Christ. He accepted people exactly as they were. He called a tax collector (considered the scourge of that society) to be in his closest circle of followers. He accepted the sacrifice of a “woman who had lived a sinful life” (here). He was present when a woman caught in the act of adultery was dragged into the street to be stoned and he released her. He convicted those wishing to stone her such that they all finally walked away without a single stone being thrown. And then, as if he didn’t know exactly what had happened, he turned to the woman and asked, “Where are they? Has no one condemned you?”
“No one, sir,” she responded.
“Then neither do I condemn you,” he said. “Go now and leave your life of sin.”
(here)
What a man! What a God!
And what a mess we have made of portraying Him to the world around us.
Regardless of faith, it is an interesting book thus far and I’m finding it to be a good read. I may or may not post more as I progress through the book, but for those interested, the upcoming chapters cover the following perceptions people have of Christians:
Hypocritical;
Only interested in “getting you saved!”;
Antihomosexual;
Sheltered;
Too political; and
Judgmental
I will, at the very least, post when I am finished, in case anyone is interested in reading it.

6 comments
Comments feed for this article
May 4, 2009 at 3:59 pm
awfrick
I had also read this book and found it to be great as well. I think the conservative, American God ideal is starting to unravel in the light of reason.
May 4, 2009 at 4:34 pm
Tara
Don’t get me wrong, I firmly believe in Jesus Christ and the God of the Christian Bible. I think that it’s just time that we as Christians critically examine the expression* of our faith. It surprises me that there is a desire for static Christianity. We would like to freeze it at a time when it was good and thriving and growing. But the problem with freezing is that the cold a) prevents the thing from continuing to grow and thrive, and b) eventually kills it. We shouldn’t be freezing the Christian faith and attempting to preserve it as it was. We should be tending to the Christian faith corporately and individually and allowing it to grow in the Truth and Love that it always has. Our generation is different from our grandparents’ generation, and even different from our parents’. Even from our older siblings’ generation
. Our faith should reflect those differences. It must stand on the foundation of Scripture, and the truth therein, but as individual Christians are different today, so too should the expression of that faith be different.
*expression being defined as how we worship and believe, not what we worship and believe
May 4, 2009 at 4:58 pm
E.D. Jones
To think that I almost didn’t take a break at lunch to browse recent “Christian” posts. I came so close to not stumbling upon your post. Thank you so much for the reference to this book. If you visit my blog you will see that my purpose is to present the truth as contrasted with the misconceptions and deceptions that are too often conveyed by those of us (me included), who call ourselves Christian. We are not always good witnesses of the truth.
My next stop, after leaving your web site, will be to order the book.
Thank you very much,
E.D. Jones
May 4, 2009 at 7:40 pm
ubuntucat
Glad you’re blogging again.
This book sounds interesting. As I live in the San Francisco Bay Area, I get this perception all the time, so it’s no surprise to me.
I think part of the problem is that it’s easy to get comfortable and cocky with our faith. Ritual (Bible studies, quiet time, church, offering, community service) is an easy fallback to actually humbling yourself and opening yourself up to loving others.
There are two key passages in which the Bible makes it pretty clear where our priorities should lie:
1. Jesus saying the two greatest commandments (love God, love your neighbor)
2. Paul saying you can speak in tongues and move mountains and blah blah blah, and that all means nothing if you don’t have love.
June 11, 2009 at 8:17 pm
Jasmine
You mentioned this post in your letter last letter, phrased as a question, if you recall. Very interesting post about a most interesting book! I’ll respond here instead of by letter because I’m behind on my letter writing
I am very aware of how mainstream Christianity is viewed by people who are of other faiths and/or are disillusioned with their faith themselves. It is the reason church attendance has dropped so dramatically in the past fifty years worldwide. As someone who is ouside the faith, I think it is important that books like this are released, read and discussed amongst Christians. In my own opinion, much of the frustration people feel toward Christianity is in fact powerful anger at having their own opinion ignored. Many, of not most conversations about Christianity quickly become debates about who is “right”. It is an argument, insisting that one opinion is superior, instead of an exchange of opinions and beliefs.
The struggle is that converting others is a central part of Christianity, but respecting the beliefs of others is not ( at least not in those precise terms). Particularly in Canada, where such a multitude of faiths must co-exist without clashing, we have become accustomed to having our personal beliefs, and by extention our own opinions respected, or al least allowed. As you said, when some Christians share their faith with others, it is not from an attitude of Love. “Look how wonderful my life is now that I am embracing Christ!”, it is more about “Rightness” NOT Truth. “Look how wrong you are about life, poor misguided thing. I’m right, now do it my way.” Truth supercedes argument- it cannot be argued against, and is very humble. Truth becomes an argument about right/wrong when arrogance gets involved. This is almost never intentional, but it has contributed to the image problem of Christianity as a whole.
This attitude is difficult to swallow, particularly because most branches of Christianity claim that the others are wrong. There is not even a consensus about which Bible is correct! This lack of inner clarity adds to the confusion, particularly when the Bible is interpreted in a way that simply does not consider modern life. Your point about the “how” changing and not the”what” is very well made, because at its core, Christianity is a truly wonderful concept. Somehow, the intentions are good, but the message is coming out badly warped.
Curiously, I have never found a person who has a resentful attitude toward Quakers, or the Amish*. And religion is one of my favourite topics, so I often ask, or draw comparisons from those specific branches! General opinion seems to be that those two groups don’t bother about improving everyone else; they improve themselves first, and just quietly go around being excellent Christians and members of society. They lead by example, and only share their profound faith if a person is interested in hearing it. In other words, they prioritise Love in their interactions with others, and maintain integral Truth within themselves. That attitude makes them seem the least judgemental of all Christian branches.
That was a really well written post, Tara. If your church has any publications, a newsletter, or anything, you should submit it.
*disbelief, arrogance, curiosity, impatience, and ignorance, yes. Resentment, never. Yet resentment is the primary emotion attached to mainstream Christianity amongst non-Christians. Odd, isn’t it?
June 11, 2009 at 8:18 pm
Jasmine
Um. Wow. That was MUCH longer than I thought it would be, sorry!
J